-
10 Questions with ... Brian Maloney
November 22, 2005
Have an opinion? Add your comment below. -
NAME:Brian MaloneyPOSITION:Host, WriterWEBSITE:Radio EqualizerBASED IN: Southeastern MassachusettsBORN:CaliforniaRAISED:Santa Cruz, CA
BRIEF CAREER SYNOPSIS:
In 1993, I was working on state legislative campaigns in California. One night, I was asked to stand in for candidate Bruce McPherson, at a debate against his Democratic opponent. KSCO-AM (Santa Cruz-Monterey-Salinas) owner Michael Zwerling was in the audience and asked me to try talk radio. McPherson won as a Republican in an overwhelmingly Democratic district and is now California's Secretary Of State.
I was hired away from KSCO in 1996 to take the afternoon drive slot at Reno's KOH-AM, working for Dan Mason and Brian Jennings. Had a great time there, then was asked to take a shift at Seattle's KVI-AM, in 1998. Spent just short of two years there during a period of station turmoil. Before joining Seattle's KIRO-AM in 2001, took part in on-air projects with Broadcast Programming and served as a regular fill-in host in Dallas and Kansas City. Left KIRO in 2004 after a highly-publicized media flap.
1. From host to blogging about talk radio- what got you into the blogosphere?
The Radio Equalizer site really came about by accident. After leaving KIRO, listeners asked me to start a political blog, but the occasional talk radio pieces would see huge traffic spikes. It didn't take long to get a clue and realize that's what readers were looking for, a talk radio coverage site.
Previously, I'd written for a daily newspaper in California, so shifting partly into writing wasn't a big stretch. It carries my conservative bent, but comments are open to anyone and it's loaded with liberal detractors.
I'm still working as a fill-in host in various cities, including here in New England and for the Talk Radio Network. I was so wrapped up in investigative projects that I wasn't looking to get back into regular talk hosting for a while. About a month ago, however, I realized how much I missed it and began to make inquiries.
It's important to broaden one's horizons a bit and not get stuck in a rut. It's easy to get typecast, stuck in a particular region or area of expertise. My background is broad: I studied economics, international politics, Ireland, the UK, Canada and the Eastern Caribbean region, particularly Trinidad and Tobago. And I've lived all over America as well, the more experienced, the better it can be appreciated.
2. You and Michelle Malkin have been pretty relentless on the trail of Air America Radio. Whether it's that network or other syndicated or local product, can liberal talk work? If not, why not, and if so, what will they need to do to make it work?
Michelle and I were perfect to tackle the Air America investigation, because we both have strong Seattle ties. Its worst-kept secret is that decisions are made there by Rob Glaser and Eileen Quigley, both longtime Puget Sound Area political activists (Ed. Note: Real Networks' Glazer serves as AAR Chairman and Quigley as Chief of Staff to the Chairman of the AAR Board). Malkin and I are determined to see issues through- I observed this during her Seattle Times tenure and I'd like to think I had the same habit at KVI and KIRO.
I have nothing against liberals doing talk radio; at KIRO, I was the token conservative. I only dealt with one host in Seattle that was over the line. Since 1993, I've worked with a number of leftists, all the way back to KSCO. Through its own corporate behavior, Air America brought this upon itself. It's a journalistic goldmine, which is why we've frequently been battling New York City newspapers over who can get stories out first. Liberal talk's worked just fine at KGO and a few other local stations. If I were running Air America, my first call would have been to KGO management to find out how they'd done it. Barring further cash infusions that seem increasingly unlikely, I don't think Air America will be able to stick around much longer. It's too late to fix it.
However, I see no reason why liberal programming from Jones can't remain on the air for some time. In fact, I could see Jones with more "progressive" talkers if Jones and Air America sever ties. At least at Jones you have radio people making the calls. Anyone expecting significant ratings outside of Portland and a few other places, however, is going to be very disappointed. At Air America, it's been a bunch of record promoters and film producers running around the building. That really never made sense.
3. Take politics out of the equation for a minute and tell us: what makes a good talk show? What do you listen for in a talk show?
You need to grab them in the first two minutes. Right out of the gate you need energy, headline teases, relevance and gravitas. If you aren't focused in the first segment, listeners have no reason to invest in your show. Then, in each subsequent segment, you've got to remind them why they're still with you. The energy level must remain high and you need to know what you're talking about. Let them know what's coming up. Refresh it all for the guy who tuned in halfway through. They're busy, you can't force them to listen. And, they have a million other choices now. You've got to develop the topic for the listener and make it happen. Reading the headlines doesn't do it.
It's stunning to hear how many talk novices have been thrown into syndicated radio shows and nobody's coaching them. The results are dreadful. You can't wing it and survive for long. Experience matters; some of them aren't prepping and it shows. I've recently done many radio interviews on the Air America story, and I've noticed some of the local hosts do this far better than the national guys.
4. Talk radio slumped somewhat in the ratings in 2005, although it's showing some signs of rebounding. Still, it's down- do you think it's just a predictable drop coming off an election year or do you think there are symptoms of politics fatigue among radio listeners?
For the most part, we've recently been turning out a shoddy product and Arbitron finally caught up. Election boosts are sometimes overstated. We're making K Cars, but there's no Lee Iacocca, or a federal talk radio bailout coming. Some still think they can force people to listen; the arrogance never went away. It's incredible.
Removing political topics is a mistake; to fix the situation, you need lively, interesting hosts with subject depth. Experienced talk programmers have been pushed aside in favor of cluster managers with sales backgrounds. They have no idea how to make talk radio succeed. Then they wonder why they're getting clobbered.
The 2006 midterm elections will do little for talk radio, because there are very few truly competitive races remaining, because of rampant gerrymandering. It will be very different in 2008, which should be a wild year, but it's too far down the road. So the time to get talk radio in shape is now. Talk radio listeners have changed and are begging the industry to take notice. In order to invest in talk shows, they want activist hosts, heavily involved in issues. They don't want cheap, lame stunts, but a sense that a station is bringing about change in the community. KFI's John and Ken, KSFO's Lee and Melanie and KVI (at its peak some years back), provide the models for how it should be done. Listening to John and Ken on California recall election night was incredible radio. Melanie Morgan's activism with Move America Forward has brought increased listener loyalty to KSFO.
The northeast and New England no longer lead the way in talk radio; it's fallen apart in just a few short years. Sad to see.
5. Why do you think there just isn't a lot of critical analysis or reviewing of radio- not just talk radio, but any radio- in the other media? Newspapers all have TV critics- why do the same papers, with a few exceptions, ignore radio to the extent that they don't even have staffers assigned to the beat or use freelancers or wire copy to cover the medium?
With daily newspapers, it varies by city. Radio journalism's still strong in Chicago, Philly, Denver and a few other places. It's vanishing in Dallas-Fort Worth and elsewhere. There's no longer an investigative zeal in Boston, so a lot of stories slide right past them. I've noticed that, in some cities, the interns or cub reporters get the radio beat, which results in fluff coverage. We're controversial, but the papers avoid covering the noise we make.
They're still worried about competition; they'd be better off writing about us when we do something interesting. Editors refuse to modernize and it's killing them.
6. In your own career, who have been your influences and why?
First, Ed Burke, who was my coach when I was training for the hammer throw in California. He's a three-time Olympian who carried the American flag using one arm at the 1984 opening ceremonies in Los Angeles. He helped my other coach, Dr. Ladislav Pataki, escape from behind the Iron Curtain in 1985. Burke and Pataki helped me understand why Santa Cruz-style socialism would never succeed.
Bob Lissner, a retired high school teacher in Santa Cruz and Democrat activist, took me under his wing and taught me all about hardball
campaigning. University of California Professor Emeritus John Ellis has been a major influence who still provides advice to this day. He's a former liberal who took on the politically correct campus establishment.
Secretary of State McPherson helped me see what really matters in life. In 2001, his son was murdered in San Francisco because he didn't give up his wallet fast enough to a gangbanger. I talked to Bruce about it two years ago, he told me that you can never, ever give your child enough love and support.
In radio, I've had a lot of support and advice from Jeff Hillery at KLIF/Dallas and Tony Miner, who hired me at KVI, in addition to the others mentioned above. I deal with a lot of great programmers now for the blog site.
7. With a perception in the business that talk, especially on FM, will be growing in the coming years as one thing radio can do- personality, on an exclusive basis- that can't be easily duplicated by competing media, do you think that the idea of the local host will return as well? Do you expect the tide to turn from syndication back towards local talk, or are we too far down the cost-cutting road to go back?
The industry has no choice but to go back to local talk, because not very many syndicated hosts are truly successful. Trim the bureaucracy and hire some local hosts, it's very simple. There's more money in local talk anyway, because of increased spots, live reads and remotes. The current way isn't working: in the northeast, for example, there's now almost no reason to listen to talk radio in the evenings. There's almost nothing live and local, even during the day.
Infinity was smart to grab onto the FM idea, even if it's still half-baked. It's forward-thinking. Local talk is the only way to compete against the new threats. It's the one thing they can't easily do. Slash-and-burn budgets are suicidal now. Invest in the product or croak.
8. What do you see yourself doing in ten years? Host, blogger, something else, all of the above, none of the above?
One really can't just be a radio talk host anymore, it isn't enough. You've got to have a blog, write and do some TV here and there. In the short term, I'll be doing more columns like our recent New York Post Op-Ed and cable talk appearances such as last month's O'Reilly Factor visit. Certainly hope to have some talk radio role in 10 years, doubt we'll be on the AM band, however.
9. Fill in the blank: I can't make it through the day without _____________.
...at least four cups of Barry's Tea, Crown Pilot or Royal Lunch crackers and a walk on the beach.
10. What's the best advice you ever got? The worst?
Best: to not put all of your eggs in one basket and avoid being typecast. Get some exposure to different regions of the country.
Worst: I've probably given more bad advice than I've received.
-
-