-
They'd Remember That If They Were Involved
-
And now, we have a clearer idea of what the defendants were talking about in the Birmingham penis amputation case when they said at the outset that the charges were baseless: They say they never performed a circumcision on the guy at all, much less amputate anything. And their attorney is saying that the filing of a lawsuit without looking at medical records is so irresponsible that they're going after the plaintiff and his lawyers for sanctions and disciplinary actions. So, if the incident never happened as the plaintiff claims, what happened to his penis? Did he cut it off himself? (WVTM-TV/Birmingham)
Have an opinion? Add your comment below.